Rankings Semiconductors Cerebras

Cerebras

Semiconductors · United StatesRank 812 of 829Prices 2 Nov 2026Model 1.4

The model found several serious problems. That does not mean the stock will fall.

Biggest deductions

  • Multiples vs peers (short history)−30
  • Margin−9
  • Customer concentration−6

Strengths

  • Net cash+3
  • Raised guidance and order book+3

How the score is built

From 100 to 22, step by step: points off for the business, the price and the cracks, back for documented strengths, then three data adjustments.

100Start
22Score

Hover or select a step to see what drove it. Steps with findings open them below.

Key numbers

As of 2 Nov 2026. Analyst targets tend to be optimistic; read upside as a hint, not a forecast.

Price
96.36 USD
Median analyst target
290.00 USD
Upside to median
+201.0%
Analysts
11
Target range
175.00 – 325.00 USD
52-week change
–
P/E (trailing)
n/a
Forward P/E
n/a
PEG
n/a

Findings

Every deduction and every plus, with its source. Open a step to read them.

Business

Is the company getting stronger, not just bigger? · 4 findings
−18 of −30
  • Margin
    GAAP operating margin is −81% TTM (operating loss −$552m on revenue of $681m) and −265% in Q2. GAAP gross margin fell to 14.2% in Q2 from 44.6% in Q1; even core gross margin is only 40.6%, and full-year guidance for core operating margin is −17 to −19%. FCF is −$680m TTM because capex has risen to $747m. The loss counts here and not again under ROIC (−24%).
    −9
  • Quality of growth
    GAAP revenue in Q2 was $180.1m (+74%), below the expectation of $194m and lower than Q1 ($193.4m). Hardware sales halved from $110.6m to $54.1m in a quarter; growth now comes from its own cloud operations ($126m), which require Cerebras to build and lease data centres itself (600 MW under contract). The business thus becomes more capital-heavy, not stronger.
    −4
  • Earnings quality and share-based pay
    Share-based pay was $386.6m in the first half of 2026 vs $22.4m the year before (of which $273.6m RSU expense triggered by the IPO). Management's 'core' figures exclude both the pay and the amortization of customer warrants; the difference between core net result (−$6.9m) and GAAP (−$450.5m) in Q2 is $444m.
    −3
  • Moat and pricing power
    The wafer-scale chip gives a real speed advantage in inference, but the core gross margin of approx. 40% (guidance 38–40% in Q3) vs Nvidia's approx. 75% and AMD's 56% shows weak pricing power. The software ecosystem is far smaller than CUDA, and Nvidia has licensed Groq's inference technology since December 2025.
    −2

Price

Today's multiples against the company's own history and its peers. · 1 finding
−30 of −35
  • Multiples vs peers (short history)
    Market cap $41.5bn and EV $35.1bn for a loss-making company: P/S 60 and EV/Sales 51 TTM, forward P/S 28. For comparison: Nvidia P/S 18.9 (forward 10.7), AMD 25.4 (15.5), Broadcom 20.1 (11.4) and CoreWeave EV/Sales 12.6 - all profitable or at far larger scale. At the quarter-end in June P/S was 87. Even on analysts' 2027 estimate ($2.95bn, almost a tripling) EV/Sales is about 12, and that estimate rests on the OpenAI ramp.
    −30

Cracks

Cash flow, customers, debt, insiders, guidance and what sits behind the headline numbers. · 8 findings
−30 of −35
  • Customer concentration
    Customer A accounted for 34% of revenue in Q2 and 49% in the first half, customer B for 32% (Q2) and customer C for 10%; three customers = 76% of Q2. A and D are related parties (UAE: MBZUAI and G42, which accounted for 86% in 2025), and OpenAI revenue was $56.8m in Q2 (about 32%). Two customers make up 76% of receivables.
    −6
  • OpenAI counterparty risk
    OpenAI is at once the largest growth customer (deal of over $20bn for 750 MW through 2028, most of RPO of $25.4bn), lender (loan of $1,004.6m, $918m outstanding, due immediately and where OpenAI can take over the account if the agreement ends) and future shareholder (warrants for up to 33.4m shares at $0.00001, approx. 14% of the shares; 10m vested). Revenue is in practice partly bought with shares.
    −5
  • Competition
    According to SemiAnalysis, OpenAI's new GPT-6.1 Sol Ultrafast (DevDay 29/9) runs on Nvidia GPUs and not on Cerebras, which powered the previous Ultrafast version; the stock fell about 20% in the week. Nvidia (with the Groq licence), AMD and the hyperscalers' own chips attack precisely fast inference, which is Cerebras' core.
    −4
  • Lock-up, dilution and insider sales
    The share count has risen 61% over a year. The lock-up is released in tranches: up to 14.6m shares every other week since mid-August, 19.4m on 30/9 and the main expiry around November. The same day COO Dhiraj Mallick filed Form 144 for the sale of 396,000 shares ($77.9m) and CFO Robert Komin 32,500 shares ($6.4m). The stock trades below the IPO price of $185.
    −5
  • Governance (A/B shares)
    B shares have 20 votes and A shares 1 (N shares 0). As of 5/8 2026 there were 112.2m A and 111.6m B shares, so the B shareholders (the founders Feldman, Lie, Fricker, James and early investors) have about 95% of the votes; ordinary shareholders effectively have no influence.
    −3
  • Execution and supplier dependence
    All wafers are produced by TSMC, and according to the prospectus a change of foundry would require considerable development and delay products. At the same time 600 MW of data centre capacity must be built out before the end of 2027; in Q2, leasing of third-party facilities to OpenAI pushed the gross margin down, and capex was $549m in half a year.
    −4
  • Geopolitics and CFIUS
    The IPO was delayed for over a year by CFIUS' review of G42's ownership stake (former Huawei ties); the solution was non-voting shares and a security agreement. The largest customer is still UAE-based and depends on US export licenses for advanced AI chips.
    −2
  • Price and sentiment
    The price ($174.67) is about 55% below the peak of $386 and 50% below the opening price; 11.6% of the free float is sold short.
    −1

Plus

Only documented strengths. · 2 findings
+6 of +15
  • Net cash
    Net cash $6.43bn ($7.92bn in cash and investments vs $1.49bn debt incl. the OpenAI loan), approx. 15% of the market cap; current ratio 5.8. The IPO raised $5.55bn, so the buildout is funded for several years.
    +3
  • Raised guidance and order book
    Full-year guidance for core revenue raised to $880–890m (+73–75%) and all core targets beaten in Q2; core cloud revenue +287%. Remaining performance obligations (RPO) are $25.4bn, about 37 times TTM revenue.
    +3

Caveats

What the score does not capture, or where the data is weak.
Listed 14 May 2026 (IPO price $185, opened at $350), so there is no own multiple history; T2 is assessed against peers and the absolute level. Loss-making: P/E and PEG are meaningless. The company steers by 'core' figures that exclude share-based pay ($377m in Q2, of which $273.6m is a one-off IPO expense) and amortisation of customer warrants ($44m in Q2, booked as a deduction from revenue). The 10-Q does not name customers A–D; that A and D are G42/MBZUAI is based on the prospectus's related-party disclosures. SemiAnalysis' claim that OpenAI runs GPT-6.1 Sol Ultrafast on Nvidia is unconfirmed, and Sam Altman called Cerebras a 'close partner' on 3/10. The exact lock-up schedule (main expiry about 9 to mid-November 2026), unrealised share-based pay, actually executed insider sales (Form 4) and the terms of G42's security agreement with CFIUS have not been examined. Price $174.67 on 7/10 2026.

Also in Semiconductors

The highest scores in the same industry.

Whole industry