Rankings Construction & materials Cibus Real Estate

Cibus Real Estate

Construction & materials · SwedenRank 404 of 829Prices 3 Nov 2026Model 1.4

A good business with a real question mark: the price, a crack, or both.

Biggest deductions

  • Debt−10
  • ROIC−5
  • Quality of growth−5

Strengths

  • Operations+2

How the score is built

From 100 to 61, step by step: points off for the business, the price and the cracks, back for documented strengths, then three data adjustments.

100Start
61Score

Hover or select a step to see what drove it. Steps with findings open them below.

Key numbers

As of 3 Nov 2026. Analyst targets tend to be optimistic; read upside as a hint, not a forecast.

Price
130.90 SEK
Median analyst target
144.91 SEK
Upside to median
+10.7%
Analysts
6
Target range
129.00 – 183.95 SEK
52-week change
−21%
P/E (trailing)
11.5
Forward P/E
11.7
PEG
1.83

Findings

Every deduction and every plus, with its source. Open a step to read them.

Business

Is the company getting stronger, not just bigger? · 3 findings
−13 of −30
  • ROIC
    ROIC 4.8% vs WACC 6.0%; returns have been 4–6% since 2021 with no improvement.
    −5
  • Quality of growth
    Revenue has grown through acquisitions (+33% in 2025), but EPS is EUR 1.03 (TTM) vs 1.66 in 2022 – bigger, not stronger per share.
    −5
  • Capital allocation
    Share count +21% in a year and +33% in 2025; new shares are issued at around P/B 1 to fund acquisitions.
    −3

Price

Today's multiples against the company's own history and its peers. · 1 finding
−2 of −35
  • Multiples vs own history
    P/B 0.90 and EV/EBITDA 16.8 are at the low end of its own history (0.9–2.1 and 16.8–29), but still 17× EBITDA for a 5% return; price about 86% of EPRA NRV (EUR 13.0).
    −2

Cracks

Cash flow, customers, debt, insiders, guidance and what sits behind the headline numbers. · 5 findings
−22 of −35
  • Debt
    Loan-to-value (LTV) 59.1% vs 55.0% a year ago; net debt 10.8× EBITDA; interest cover 2.4×; current ratio 0.27.
    −10
  • Customer concentration
    Half of rental income comes from Finland, where Kesko, Tokmanni and S Group dominate the tenant list.
    −4
  • Macro
    With 59% LTV and 2.4× interest cover, value and dividend are very sensitive to interest rates and yield requirements.
    −3
  • Share price trend
    The share price is down 25% over 52 weeks and 4% today (RSI 17) with no cause found; analyst targets have not been updated since May.
    −3
  • Governance
    Insiders own only 0.07% of the shares.
    −2

Plus

Only documented strengths. · 1 finding
+2 of +15
  • Operations
    Net operating income (NOI) +15% in Q2; management expects no major lease terminations in the next 12 months.
    +2

Caveats

What the score does not capture, or where the data is weak.
LTV 59% and debt 11x EBITDA; price targets from May (before a −25% price fall); real estate does not fit the industry list (placed under Construction)

Also in Construction & materials

The highest scores in the same industry.

Whole industry