Rankings Tech hardware & optics Fabrinet

Fabrinet

Tech hardware & optics · United StatesRank 100 of 829Prices 2 Nov 2026Model 1.470+ zone

In the 70+ zone: a score above 70 with more than 20% upside to the median analyst target.

Biggest deductions

  • Multiples vs own history and peers−9
  • Customer concentration−5
  • Customers are shifting (Nvidia)−5

Strengths

  • Net cash+3
  • Guidance and growth+2
  • Broader customer base+1

How the score is built

From 100 to 82, step by step: points off for the business, the price and the cracks, back for documented strengths, then three data adjustments.

100Start
82Score

Hover or select a step to see what drove it. Steps with findings open them below.

Key numbers

As of 2 Nov 2026. Analyst targets tend to be optimistic; read upside as a hint, not a forecast.

Price
314.70 USD
Median analyst target
600.00 USD
Upside to median
+90.7%
Analysts
9
Target range
385.00 – 800.00 USD
52-week change
−29%
P/E (trailing)
23.8
Forward P/E
16.3
PEG
n/a

Findings

Every deduction and every plus, with its source. Open a step to read them.

Business

Is the company getting stronger, not just bigger? · 2 findings
−5 of −30
  • Margin
    The gross margin is 12.0% (FY26) vs 12.1–12.7% in FY22–25, and the operating margin has been flat at 9.1–10.0% for five years. Revenue has grown from $2.3bn to 4.6bn, but the business has become bigger, not stronger; a contract manufacturer without pricing power. ROIC is high, though (27–31%).
    −3
  • Quality of earnings
    Operating cash flow fell to $257m (FY26) from $413m (FY24) while net profit rose to $473m: only 54% of profit turned into cash, because inventory and receivables are tied up in growth.
    −2

Price

Today's multiples against the company's own history and its peers. · 1 finding
−9 of −35
  • Multiples vs own history and peers
    P/E 31.4 vs 15.3–39.8 in FY22–26 (average 27.1); EV/EBITDA 26.0 vs 10.6–33.7 (average 21.7); P/S 3.2 vs 1.4–4.1. Forward P/E 22.5 is below FY24–26 (26–32), but P/FCF is meaningless (FCF ≈ 0). Above its own average for a contract manufacturer with a 12% gross margin.
    −9

Cracks

Cash flow, customers, debt, insiders, guidance and what sits behind the headline numbers. · 5 findings
−17 of −35
  • Customer concentration
    Four customers above 10% in FY26: Cisco 19.9%, Nvidia 16.3%, Nokia 10.7% and Amazon 10.5%, 57.4% in total (FY25: two customers, 45.8%).
    −5
  • Customers are shifting (Nvidia)
    Nvidia's share fell from 27.6% of $3.42bn (FY25) to 16.3% of $4.64bn (FY26), i.e. from about $944m to about 757m (−20%), while Nvidia's own revenue grew strongly: Nvidia is spreading purchases across more suppliers.
    −5
  • Cash flow and capex
    FCF of $4m in FY26 ($207m in FY25) and −$37m in Q4; capex has doubled to $253m, and the plan for $12.5–14bn of capacity (Building 10, Pinehurst and up to two new plants in Chonburi) requires continued heavy investment.
    −4
  • Margin pressure and component shortages
    The Q4 gross margin fell 30 bp to 12.2%, management warned of pressure on the Q1 gross margin and shortages of key components, and the stock fell about 8.6% despite a beat.
    −2
  • Tax (Pillar Two)
    Fabrinet expensed $57.4m of current tax under Pillar Two (UTPR) in FY26, and management cites uncertainty about the Thai tax regime. The very low tax rate so far is under pressure.
    −1

Plus

Only documented strengths. · 3 findings
+6 of +15
  • Net cash
    Net cash $871m ($24 per share) and almost no debt ($4m).
    +3
  • Guidance and growth
    Q4 revenue of $1.316bn (+45%) beat guidance; data centre +68%. Q1 FY27 is guided at $1.375–1.425bn (+43% at the midpoint) and non-GAAP EPS of $4.10–4.25.
    +2
  • Broader customer base
    Amazon and Nokia are new customers above 10% in FY26, so dependence on Nvidia is reduced.
    +1

Caveats

What the score does not capture, or where the data is weak.
Price targets (median $750, only 9 analysts) have not been cut after the fall to $410 (−44% from the peak). Nvidia revenue fell about 20% in FY26, and four customers account for 57%. FCF is about 0 due to factory expansion towards $12.5–14bn of capacity, and operating cash flow is only 54% of net income. The Amazon warrant and Pillar Two tax are not fully explained.

Also in Tech hardware & optics

The highest scores in the same industry.

Whole industry