Rankings Software, cloud & internet Meta Platforms
Meta Platforms
69
15070100
A view of the same findings, not a new score. How it works
A good business with a real question mark: the price, a crack, or both.
Biggest deductions
- Multiples vs own history and peers−13
- Cash flow and capex−8
- Lawsuits and regulation (children and teens)−5
Strengths
- Pricing power and broad customer base+3
- Buybacks+1
How the score is built
From 100 to 69, step by step: points off for the business, the price and the cracks, back for documented strengths, then three data adjustments.
Start
Score
Hover or select a step to see what drove it. Steps with findings open them below.
Key numbers
As of 2 Nov 2026. Analyst targets tend to be optimistic; read upside as a hint, not a forecast.
- Price
- 606.73 USD
- Median analyst target
- 850.00 USD
- Upside to median
- +40.1%
- Analysts
- 62
- Target range
- 629.06 – 1,050 USD
- 52-week change
- −6%
- P/E (trailing)
- 20.7
- Forward P/E
- 18.4
- PEG
- 0.95
Findings
Every deduction and every plus, with its source. Open a step to read them.
Business
Is the company getting stronger, not just bigger? · 3 findings−9 of −30
- −4MarginThe operating margin fell in Q2 to 31% from 43%, because costs rose 55% (incl. $2.4bn for lawsuits and severance after 8,000 layoffs in May). The TTM margin is 38.1% vs 41.4% (2025) and 42.2% (2024). 2026 cost guidance has been raised to $165–169bn, and analysts expect only +4% EPS in 2026 vs +26% revenue: bigger, not stronger.
- −3ROICROIC has fallen from 43.9% (2024) to 31.3% (2025) and 25.4% TTM, and ROCE from 28.6% to 22.1%. Capex of $89bn TTM vs depreciation of $22.7bn means depreciation will squeeze returns further in the coming years. Still far above a WACC of 10.5%.
- −2Capital allocationReality Labs lost $4.6bn in Q2 ($4.5bn a year earlier) on revenue of about $2.3bn a year; the loss has been around $18–20bn a year for several years with no improvement.
Price
Today's multiples against the company's own history and its peers. · 1 finding−13 of −35
- −13Multiples vs own history and peersTrailing P/E 27.0 vs 13.6–27.5 in 2021–25 (the 2025 figure was lifted by a one-off tax charge, so the old claim of 'highest in 6 years' does not quite hold); forward P/E 22.2 vs 16.4–24.7, i.e. mid-range; EV/EBITDA 16.8 vs 7.1–17.2, at the top; P/FCF 44.5 vs 16.4–36.1 is the highest ever, and consensus expects negative FCF (−$6.5bn) in 2026. FCF yield 2.25%. Reasonable on earnings, expensive on cash flow.
Cracks
Cash flow, customers, debt, insiders, guidance and what sits behind the headline numbers. · 5 findings−20 of −35
- −8Cash flow and capexFCF in Q2 was only $784m ($8.5bn a year earlier), because capex almost doubled to $31.1bn. 2026 capex guidance is $130–145bn vs operating cash flow of about $130bn TTM, and consensus expects negative FCF for the whole of 2026.
- −4Debt and off-balance-sheet commitmentsFrom net cash of $28.8bn (2024) to net debt of $22.1bn; $54.8bn of new debt over the last 12 months, and long-term debt is $83.7bn. On top comes the Hyperion data centre ($27bn), which sits off balance sheet in a JV with Blue Owl (80%), but where Meta has given a 16-year residual-value guarantee.
- −5Lawsuits and regulation (children and teens)A New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375m in March, and in August Meta became the first social network declared a 'public nuisance' and was ordered to pay $567m into a fund and tighten teen accounts. Meta is appealing. Management itself writes that several youth lawsuits in the US this year 'may ultimately result in a material loss', and Q2 carried $2.4bn of legal and severance costs.
- −2Competition (AI agents)The September rally of about 30% rests on the AI agent Muse, which has no revenue yet. The stock fell 4.8% on 28/9 when OpenAI's competing 'o' agent and Meta's own enterprise launch made the market reprice; the share price is 8% below its $779 peak.
- −1Insider tradingZuckerberg-related entities (CZI Holdings and Chan Zuckerberg Biohub) sold 27,474 shares for $21.4m at about $777 on 24/9, near the top, under a 10b5-1 plan; continuous selling and no insider buying.
Plus
Only documented strengths. · 2 findings+4 of +15
- +3Pricing power and broad customer baseQ2 revenue rose 28% to $60.8bn with both 14% more ad impressions and a 12% higher price per ad; millions of advertisers and 3.6bn daily users. Q3 guidance $61–64bn.
- +1BuybacksThe share count has fallen 1.1% in a year; buybacks ($21.4bn) and dividends ($5.4bn) TTM are below FCF of $41.0bn. But no shares were bought back in Q2, and with negative FCF ahead, buybacks are effectively debt-funded.
Caveats
What the score does not capture, or where the data is weak.
Analysts expect negative FCF in 2026 (capex $130–145bn), and EPS grows only about 4% this year despite 26% revenue growth. The share rose about 30% in September on the AI agent Muse, which does not yet make money, and fell 4.8% on 28/9 on OpenAI's competing agent. There are several youth lawsuits in the US this year, which management itself says may result in a material loss. Q3 results come 28/10.
Also in Software, cloud & internet
The highest scores in the same industry.
