Rankings Defence, aerospace & space Northrop Grumman
Northrop Grumman
68
15070100
A view of the same findings, not a new score. How it works
A good business with a real question mark: the price, a crack, or both.
Biggest deductions
- Execution (fixed-price programmes)−6
- Multiples vs own history and peers−4
- Customer concentration−4
Strengths
- Order book+2
- Estimates+1
- Buybacks and dividend+1
How the score is built
From 100 to 68, step by step: points off for the business, the price and the cracks, back for documented strengths, then three data adjustments.
Start
Score
Hover or select a step to see what drove it. Steps with findings open them below.
Key numbers
As of 2 Nov 2026. Analyst targets tend to be optimistic; read upside as a hint, not a forecast.
- Price
- 555.32 USD
- Median analyst target
- 625.00 USD
- Upside to median
- +12.5%
- Analysts
- 26
- Target range
- 430.00 – 815.00 USD
- 52-week change
- −5%
- P/E (trailing)
- 17.5
- Forward P/E
- 18.8
- PEG
- 2.99
Findings
Every deduction and every plus, with its source. Open a step to read them.
Business
Is the company getting stronger, not just bigger? · 3 findings−6 of −30
- −3MarginThe Q2 operating margin was 10.1% vs 13.8%; adjusted for the $231m gain on the sale of the training business in Q2 2025, it has fallen about 1.4 percentage points (from about 11.5%). Defense Systems fell from 12.7% to 7.5% and Space from 10.6% to 8.6%. Guided segment margin about 11% ($4.85–5.0bn on about $44bn) – not a business getting stronger.
- −2Capital allocationAn agreement with the US Air Force in Q1 2026 to raise the B-21 production rate, with Northrop itself investing about $2.5bn over several years – in a programme whose fixed-price LRIP lots have already cost about $2.0bn in losses. At the same time buybacks have almost stopped ($68m in H1, nothing in Q2).
- −1Quality of growthSpace Systems has shrunk from $11.9bn (2023) to 10.8bn TTM, while growth comes from B-21 and Sentinel with low or negative margins. ROIC of 15.0% TTM is in line with 2024 (16.0%) but below 20.5% in 2022.
Price
Today's multiples against the company's own history and its peers. · 1 finding−4 of −35
- −4Multiples vs own history and peersForward P/E 17.3 vs 15.6–24.1 in FY21–25 (average about 19.5); trailing P/E 16.1 (FY24 16.4, FY25 19.5); EV/EBITDA 11.9 vs 8.1–21.0; P/FCF 19.7 – the lowest in five years (24.6–57.3). Cheap vs its own history and vs RTX, but forward EPS ($29.00) is below TTM EPS ($31.50), and EPS growth is only about 7–8% a year.
Cracks
Cash flow, customers, debt, insiders, guidance and what sits behind the headline numbers. · 6 findings−18 of −35
- −4Customer concentrationThe US government accounted for 85% of sales in H1 2026 ($17.7bn of 20.8bn); international 14%.
- −6Execution (fixed-price programmes)B-21: about $2.0bn of accumulated losses on fixed-price LRIP lots and a further $157m negative EAC adjustment in Q1 2026 ($1.0bn of the loss provision is not yet used). In Q2 negative EACs on GEM 63XL ($91m) and SiAW ($68m); Defense Systems' operating profit fell 38%.
- −2Sentinel programmeThe Sentinel ICBM is 81% over budget on the latest estimate ($140.9bn vs 77.7bn) after a Nunn-McCurdy breach and restructuring. The contract is cost-plus, so the direct loss is limited, but the programme is politically exposed; first flight test only in 2027.
- −2Insider tradingFive senior employees (including the general counsel, the controller and the heads of Mission and Defense Systems) sold about $6.4m in Feb–Mar 2026 at $700–745, near the top; since then only small sales. No open-market purchases in 2026 (the previously cited '15 purchases' were grants, not purchases).
- −1Lawsuits and investigationsThe DOJ closed its criminal investigation of pension costs (CAS) on 20/5/2026, but the civil DOJ investigation and the DCMA case on the same matter continue; the outcome cannot be predicted.
- −3Macro and budgetThe defence sector has been hit by rotation out of the sector; the stock is −34% from its $768 peak in March. The FY27 budget is only secured through a continuing resolution (CR) to 11/12, which limits new programme starts.
Plus
Only documented strengths. · 3 findings+4 of +15
- +2Order bookRecord backlog of $105bn (+17% y/y, about 2.4 years of revenue) after $20bn of orders in Q2, including $7.6bn for Sentinel.
- +1EstimatesFull-year guidance raised: revenue $43.75–44.25bn (+$250m) and MTM-adjusted EPS $28.60–29.10 (+$1.20).
- +1Buybacks and dividendTTM buybacks of $0.86bn + dividends of $1.34bn = $2.2bn, below FCF of $3.65bn; share count −1.8% and 22 years of dividend increases. The pace of buybacks has slowed sharply in 2026, though.
Caveats
What the score does not capture, or where the data is weak.
Fixed-price risk on B-21 (remaining loss provision $1.0bn) and SiAW/GEM 63XL; Sentinel 81% over budget. Adjusted FCF −$845m in the first half, and the buyback stood still in Q2. The share is −34% from the March peak; Q3 comes 20/10. Only a CR to 11/12 for the FY27 budget.
Also in Defence, aerospace & space
The highest scores in the same industry.