Rankings Construction & materials ADLER Group
ADLER Group
A view of the same findings, not a new score. How it works
The model found several serious problems. That does not mean the stock will fall.
Biggest deductions
- Leverage and maturity wall−15
- Price vs value−14
- Margin−12
Strengths
- Stable rental income and debt reduction+2
Speculative profile
A penny stock under DKK 3. The asymmetry rating is separate from the Bjarvik score and is not a recommendation.
- Asymmetry (1–10)
- 1
- Price
- 0.73 DKK
- Market value
- DKK 111m
- Cash runway
- 36 months
- Cash / debt
- 155.0 / 3,450.0m EUR
- Dilution, 12 months
- +0%
Bull case
Berlin housing prices rise 20–30%, and interest rates fall, so the portfolio (EUR 3.5bn) rises to 4.2–4.5bn. Even then the debt (about 3.45bn) and the perpetual bonds (about 2.3bn) must be covered first; only if the perpetuals can be redeemed at a low price or need not be paid in full is there value for the shares. A 3–10x from EUR 15m market cap is mathematically easy, but requires an unlikely outcome.
Bear case
Property values are standing still, and interest expenses continue to eat equity; the 2028–2030 maturity wall requires a third restructuring where debt is converted to shares and the old shares are effectively wiped out (−95–100%).
Catalysts
- 26 Nov 2026Q3 2026 results: portfolio valuation, LTV and progress in salesgradual stockanalysis.com
- 2026–2027 (ongoing)Further sales of projects and properties to repay 1L New Money debt (EUR 201m so far in 2026)gradual webdisclosure.com
- Dec 2028First large bond maturity (after the extensions to Dec 2028, Dec 2029 and Jan 2030)binary bondguide.de
How the score is built
From 100 to 26, step by step: points off for the business, the price and the cracks, back for documented strengths, then three data adjustments.
Hover or select a step to see what drove it. Steps with findings open them below.
Key numbers
As of 3 Nov 2026. Analyst targets tend to be optimistic; read upside as a hint, not a forecast.
- Price
- 0.10 EUR
- Median analyst target
- –
- Upside to median
- –
- Analysts
- none
- Target range
- –
- 52-week change
- −48%
- P/E (trailing)
- 0.1
- Forward P/E
- n/a
- PEG
- n/a
Findings
Every deduction and every plus, with its source. Open a step to read them.
Business
Is the company getting stronger, not just bigger? · 4 findings−25 of −30
- −12MarginNet result −EUR 160m in H1 2026 (−381m a year earlier) vs net rental income of only EUR 63m; interest expenses far exceed rental income. The operating margin has been negative every year 2021–2026 (−51% in 2025), and operating cash flow is negative (−52m TTM).
- −5Quality of growthThe portfolio has been sold down from approx. 70,000 to 17,465 apartments to pay debt; net rental income fell from 68 to 63m EUR in H1, and 2026 guidance is only 124–129m EUR. TTM revenue growth (+44%) stems from project sales (Consus), not operations.
- −2MoatBerlin housing with 0.9% vacancy and 3% rent growth are solid assets, but rents are tightly regulated (Mietpreisbremse), and the company has no pricing advantage – the value follows the property market and interest rates.
- −6Capital allocationMassive value destruction: the share price has fallen from EUR 10.90 (2021) to 0.10, the market cap from EUR 1.1bn to approx. EUR 15m, shareholders were diluted approx. 22.5% in the 2023 restructuring, and portfolios have been sold below book value to pay debt.
Price
Today's multiples against the company's own history and its peers. · 1 finding−14 of −35
- −14Price vs valueP/B 0.02 is meaningless: LTV is 79.2% (debt approx. EUR 3.4–3.5bn vs a rental portfolio of 3.5bn), and approx. EUR 2.3bn of subordinated perpetual bonds rank ahead of the ordinary shares. EV/Sales 6.7 and no positive earnings. The stock is a very far out-of-the-money option on rising property values.
Cracks
Cash flow, customers, debt, insiders, guidance and what sits behind the headline numbers. · 3 findings−31 of −35
- −15Leverage and maturity wallLTV 79.2% at June 2026 (up slightly) and negative operating cash flow. 97% of the debt matures in 2028 or later - i.e. a combined maturity wall in December 2028, December 2029 and January 2030, which can hardly be refinanced without new sales or a third restructuring.
- −10Shareholders are subordinated and without controlThe 2024 recapitalisation converted about EUR 2.3bn into perpetual subordinated bonds and gave the bondholders 75% of the votes via new securities. The ordinary shares have only 25% of the votes and are last in the queue.
- −6Governance and accounting trustViceroy Research made serious allegations in October 2021, and KPMG could not issue an audit opinion on the 2021 accounts. Confidence in valuations and management has not been restored.
Plus
Only documented strengths. · 1 finding+2 of +15
- +2Stable rental income and debt reductionOperational vacancy 0.9%, 3.0% like-for-like rent growth in Berlin, and EUR 201m from sales has been used to repay expensive 1L New Money debt in 2026.
Caveats
What the score does not capture, or where the data is weak.
Also in Construction & materials
The highest scores in the same industry.