Rankings Food, drinks & restaurants Coca-Cola

Coca-Cola

Food, drinks & restaurants · United StatesRank 485 of 829Prices 2 Nov 2026Model 1.4

A good business with a real question mark: the price, a crack, or both.

Biggest deductions

  • Multiples vs own history and peers−20
  • Lawsuits (IRS)−5
  • Insider trading−4

Strengths

  • Diversified base+3
  • Raised guidance+2
  • Dividend+2

How the score is built

From 100 to 55, step by step: points off for the business, the price and the cracks, back for documented strengths, then three data adjustments.

100Start
55Score

Hover or select a step to see what drove it. Steps with findings open them below.

Key numbers

As of 2 Nov 2026. Analyst targets tend to be optimistic; read upside as a hint, not a forecast.

Price
95.83 USD
Median analyst target
100.00 USD
Upside to median
+4.4%
Analysts
25
Target range
80.00 – 106.00 USD
52-week change
+39%
P/E (trailing)
28.3
Forward P/E
27.6
PEG
3.84

Findings

Every deduction and every plus, with its source. Open a step to read them.

Business

Is the company getting stronger, not just bigger? · 1 finding
−2 of −30
  • Quality of growth
    Q2 volume (+5%) was lifted by the World Cup campaign, and concentrate sales rose only 4%. Analysts expect revenue +0.3% in 2027 and EPS +6.8%, so the strong 2026 looks like a peak. The margin (31.9% vs 28.7% in 2021) and ROIC (20.1% vs 16.2%) are still rising, though, so the business is stronger, not just bigger.
    −2

Price

Today's multiples against the company's own history and its peers. · 1 finding
−20 of −35
  • Multiples vs own history and peers
    The forward P/E of 25.7 is at the top of its own 21.4–25.7 range (2021–25), and EV/EBITDA of 23.7 is above the 19.4–22.4 range. Trailing P/E 26.2 (22.9–28.8) and P/FCF 26.2 (22.7–28.9 excluding the distorted 2024–25) are within the range. NTM EV/EBITDA of about 21x is about 65% above PepsiCo (12.9x) and Keurig Dr Pepper (10.9x), and the stock is up 33% in a year. (The old list counted PEG here, which has been removed.)
    −20

Cracks

Cash flow, customers, debt, insiders, guidance and what sits behind the headline numbers. · 4 findings
−13 of −35
  • Lawsuits (IRS)
    The IRS transfer-pricing case: Coca-Cola owes about $6bn incl. interest for 2007–09 (deposited), and the same method applied to 2010–25 could cost about $14bn more. The case was argued orally in the 11th Circuit on 25/6/2026, where the judges seemed receptive to Coca-Cola. No ruling yet.
    −5
  • Insider trading
    Large, persistent insider selling with no purchases: chairman (and CEO until 31/3) James Quincey has sold about $119m in 2026 ($19.8m in March, 15.8m in May, 35.6m in June and 47.5m in July), CFO John Murphy $13.3m, EVP Jennifer Mann about $26m and the head of Latin America about $19m. Mostly option-related, but over $200m in total since March.
    −4
  • Customers are shifting
    GLP-1 drugs and the US anti-sugar movement (MAHA) are a long-term threat to soft drinks; CEO Henrique Braun had to address the GLP-1 headwind at the AGM. Volume is still growing, though, and Coca-Cola Zero Sugar grew 13% in Q1.
    −2
  • Macro and currency
    Currency contributed 4 percentage points of EPS growth in Q2 (comparable EPS +11%, i.e. about 7% ex currency) and 2 points of operating profit. Growth is driven by emerging markets, so a stronger dollar could quickly reverse the tailwind.
    −2

Plus

Only documented strengths. · 3 findings
+7 of +15
  • Raised guidance
    Full-year guidance raised in July: organic growth about 5% (previously 4–5%) and comparable EPS growth of 9–10% (previously 8–9%); market share gained in non-alcoholic beverages.
    +2
  • Diversified base
    Sold in over 200 countries through a network of independent bottlers; no dominant customer.
    +3
  • Dividend
    64 consecutive years of dividend increases; payout ratio 64%. FCF guidance for 2026 is about $12.4bn vs dividends of about $9bn and only small buybacks. The FCF dip in 2024–25 ($4.7bn and 5.3bn) was due to one-off payments (the IRS deposit and the fairlife purchase price), not operations.
    +2

Caveats

What the score does not capture, or where the data is weak.
Expensive against own history and peers, with only about 9% upside to the average price target. The IRS case (about $14bn extra for 2010–25) awaits a ruling from the 11th Circuit after oral argument on 25/6. Q2 growth was lifted by the football World Cup and 4 points of currency tailwind on EPS. Q3 results around 20/10.

Also in Food, drinks & restaurants

The highest scores in the same industry.

Whole industry