Rankings Oil & gas Jacktel

Jacktel

Oil & gas · NorwayRank 589 of 829Prices 2 Nov 2026Model 1.4

The model found several serious problems. That does not mean the stock will fall.

Biggest deductions

  • Concentration−8
  • Multiples vs own history−7
  • Quality of growth−6

Strengths

  • Dividend+3
  • Growing order book+2

How the score is built

From 100 to 47, step by step: points off for the business, the price and the cracks, back for documented strengths, then three data adjustments.

100Start
47Score

Hover or select a step to see what drove it. Steps with findings open them below.

Key numbers

As of 2 Nov 2026. Analyst targets tend to be optimistic; read upside as a hint, not a forecast.

Price
5.82 NOK
Median analyst target
–
Upside to median
–
Analysts
none
Target range
–
52-week change
+34%
P/E (trailing)
4.8
Forward P/E
8.8
PEG
n/a

Findings

Every deduction and every plus, with its source. Open a step to read them.

Business

Is the company getting stronger, not just bigger? · 4 findings
−20 of −30
  • Quality of growth
    Net profit for 2025 (USD 32.4m) includes a reversed impairment of USD 20.6m. In H1 2026 revenue fell 4% (35.5 vs 37.0m) and profit to 6.9m vs 8.1m: no underlying growth.
    −6
  • Moat
    The only NCS-approved harsh-environment jack-up accommodation rig, but it competes with semi-submersibles (Floatel, Prosafe) and drilling rigs used as hotels (Noble Interceptor, West Elara). One rig from 2011 is not a scalable moat.
    −5
  • Capital allocation
    Accumulated losses of USD 188m, and the history includes years of negative EBITDA (2020–21) and heavy dilution in the 2022 restructuring.
    −5
  • Future segment
    Dependent on maintenance on the Norwegian shelf. Offshore wind is only an option, and there is no order book after June 2028.
    −4

Price

Today's multiples against the company's own history and its peers. · 2 findings
−10 of −35
  • Multiples vs own history
    P/B 1.6 vs 0.3–0.9 in 2022–2025 and P/S 2.3 vs 0.9–1.5. Adjusted for the reversal, annualised H1 2026 gives a P/E of about 11, not 4.9.
    −7
  • Price vs order book
    EV of about NOK 2.07bn (about USD 200m) is about 3× the firm EBITDA backlog of USD 67m (86m incl. options). The rest of the value needs a new contract after 2028 for a 17-year-old rig.
    −3

Cracks

Cash flow, customers, debt, insiders, guidance and what sits behind the headline numbers. · 5 findings
−22 of −35
  • Concentration
    100% of earnings come from one rig (Haven) working for one customer (Aker BP, Valhall) in one region.
    −8
  • Debt and recontracting
    A USD 70m bond with a 10% coupon (65m outstanding, 10m amortised a year) runs to Oct 2029, i.e. after the firm contract expires in Feb 2028. There is recontracting risk before the refinancing.
    −5
  • Governance
    No employees of its own: Haven is run by Macro Offshore Management, which also owns and operates the competing accommodation rig Crossway Eagle. That is a conflict of interest.
    −3
  • Macro
    Day rates swing wildly: USD 358,000/day on Johan Sverdrup vs 49,000 on paid standby. Revenue was USD 1–9m in the weak years, and demand follows oil companies' spending.
    −4
  • Liquidity and coverage
    Listed on Euronext Growth since March 2026; average turnover about 184,000 shares a day (about NOK 1.1m), no analyst coverage and unknown insider ownership.
    −2

Plus

Only documented strengths. · 2 findings
+5 of +15
  • Dividend
    Quarterly payouts totalling USD 0.125 per share over the last four quarters (about a 12% yield) under a fixed dividend policy.
    +3
  • Growing order book
    Aker BP extended the contract from 15 to 21 months (July 2026) and added 4×1-month options; the firm contract value rose from USD 87m to 121m.
    +2

Caveats

What the score does not capture, or where the data is weak.
One asset (Haven, built 2011) and one customer; fixed contract to Feb. 2028, nothing after Jun. 2028; trailing P/E 4.9 is inflated by a USD 20.6m impairment reversal

Also in Oil & gas

The highest scores in the same industry.

Whole industry