Rankings Tech hardware & optics Net Insight

Net Insight

Tech hardware & optics · SwedenRank 371 of 829Prices 3 Nov 2026Model 1.4

A good business with a real question mark: the price, a crack, or both.

Biggest deductions

  • Margin−8
  • Quality of growth−7
  • Dependence on large orders−5

Strengths

  • Net cash+1
  • Cash flow+1

How the score is built

From 100 to 64, step by step: points off for the business, the price and the cracks, back for documented strengths, then three data adjustments.

100Start
64Score

Hover or select a step to see what drove it. Steps with findings open them below.

Key numbers

As of 3 Nov 2026. Analyst targets tend to be optimistic; read upside as a hint, not a forecast.

Price
2.48 SEK
Median analyst target
3.02 SEK
Upside to median
+22.0%
Analysts
2
Target range
2.94 – 3.10 SEK
52-week change
−33%
P/E (trailing)
n/a
Forward P/E
n/a
PEG
n/a

Findings

Every deduction and every plus, with its source. Open a step to read them.

Business

Is the company getting stronger, not just bigger? · 3 findings
−18 of −30
  • Margin
    EBIT margin −3.0% TTM and −28.3% in Q2 2026 (EBIT −SEK 25.9m) vs 13.1–13.6% in 2022–2024; gross margin has fallen from 61% to 51%.
    −8
  • Quality of growth
    Revenue fell 14% in 2025 and 36% in Q2 2026 (SEK 91.3m); H1 -21%. APAC has fallen from 87 to SEK 30m in two years, and the Americas from 228 to 172m.
    −7
  • Capital allocation
    Cash has fallen from SEK 233m (2024) to 80m; FCF was −127m in 2025 while shares were bought back (approx. 2% of the shares), and capitalized development/capex of 85–103m a year (approx. 18% of revenue) has not delivered growth.
    −3

Price

Today's multiples against the company's own history and its peers. · 2 findings
−7 of −35
  • Multiples vs own history
    P/S 2.1 and EV/Sales 2.0 vs 2.5–6.7 in 2021–2025, P/B 1.66 vs 2.1–4.0 – low vs the history, but on falling revenue and negative earnings, so P/E and EV/EBITDA cannot be calculated.
    −3
  • Absolute price level
    Market cap approx. SEK 990m with no earnings (earnings yield −1.4%) and negative FCF (−5m TTM); no analyst forecasts to support a recovery.
    −4

Cracks

Cash flow, customers, debt, insiders, guidance and what sits behind the headline numbers. · 2 findings
−9 of −35
  • Dependence on large orders
    The Q2 decline was mainly due to the absence of large media orders; CEO Andreas Eriksson himself writes that the quarter shows the need to reduce dependence on individual large orders.
    −5
  • Execution
    The strategy of time synchronisation (5G/critical infrastructure) and new Nimbra products has not yet turned revenue around after two years of decline; no financial targets or guidance in the Q2 report.
    −4

Plus

Only documented strengths. · 2 findings
+2 of +15
  • Net cash
    Net cash SEK 45m (debt 35m, leasing only) and total liquidity incl. credit facility of SEK 165m.
    +1
  • Cash flow
    Operating cash flow +SEK 45.7m in H1 2026 vs −73.2m a year earlier (release of working capital).
    +1

Caveats

What the score does not capture, or where the data is weak.
The B share (NETI B). No analyst forecasts on stockanalysis (forecast 404). The industry is set to 'Tech hardware & optics' (Nimbra equipment and time synchronisation) as the nearest. The company's segment split (Media/Time Sync) and gross margin for Q2 could not be retrieved from the PDF report; the reason for the revenue decline is taken from the company's own press releases.

Also in Tech hardware & optics

The highest scores in the same industry.

Whole industry