Rankings Oil & gas Questerre Energy
Questerre Energy
A view of the same findings, not a new score. How it works
The model found several serious problems. That does not mean the stock will fall.
Biggest deductions
- Margin and earnings−8
- Debt and liquidity−7
- Quality of growth−6
Strengths
- Asset sales and cash flow+1
- Technology test+1
Speculative profile
A penny stock under DKK 3. The asymmetry rating is separate from the Bjarvik score and is not a recommendation.
- Asymmetry (1–10)
- 4
- Price
- 1.40 DKK
- Market value
- DKK 611m
- Cash runway
- – months
- Cash / debt
- 44.2 / 113.3m CAD
- Dilution, 12 months
- +3%
Bull case
The retort in Brazil is running efficiently again, sales are reaching production (about 4,150 boe/d), and HCCO saves part of the roughly 15% of production that today goes to own consumption. With Canada (1,500 boe/d), EBITDA can reach C$70–90m. At EV/EBITDA of 4 and after the Brazil debt, that corresponds to equity of C$200–300m (1.5–2.2x). A 3–5x increase also requires a settlement or compensation in Quebec, but that value is now shared with the QGAS preference shares.
Bear case
Low oil price, customers who still fail to lift, and retort problems mean PX cannot refinance US$80m (plus PIK interest) in April 2028. Then the bondholders may take over PX, and Questerre is left with 1,500 boe/d in Canada, a blocked Quebec asset and a working capital deficit: -50-70%.
Catalysts
- 12 Nov 2026Q3 2026 results: shows whether sales in Brazil have reached the contract minimum, and whether the inventory of 40,000 barrels has been soldgradual stockanalysis.com
- Jan 2027Hearing on objections in the constitutional case against Quebec's revocation of the licences (the attorney general's reply was set for September 2026)gradual in.investing.com
- By 2027-09-30 at the latestMilestone for PX Energy: FCF of US$30m, which triggers contingent consideration shares and shows whether the acquisition holds upgradual questerre.com
How the score is built
From 100 to 45, step by step: points off for the business, the price and the cracks, back for documented strengths, then three data adjustments.
Hover or select a step to see what drove it. Steps with findings open them below.
Key numbers
As of 30 Oct 2026. Analyst targets tend to be optimistic; read upside as a hint, not a forecast.
- Price
- 0.29 CAD
- Median analyst target
- –
- Upside to median
- –
- Analysts
- none
- Target range
- –
- 52-week change
- −9%
- P/E (trailing)
- n/a
- Forward P/E
- n/a
- PEG
- n/a
Findings
Every deduction and every plus, with its source. Open a step to read them.
Business
Is the company getting stronger, not just bigger? · 4 findings−22 of −30
- −8Margin and earningsTTM operating margin −11.7% and net margin −49% (ROIC −11%). The EBITDA margin is only 26% despite revenue of CAD 140m, and FCF is just CAD 4.8m (3.4% margin). Operations went from profit in 2022 to loss every year 2023–25.
- −6Quality of growthRevenue growth (+273% TTM) was bought via PX Energy (Brazilian oil sands and shale retort from Petrobras' Petrosix technology), while Kakwa production (650 boe/d) was sold. In Q2 2026 production in Brazil was approx. 4,150 boe/d, but sales only 3,100 boe/d. Customers lifted below the contract minimum, inventory grew to 40,000 barrels, and the retort ran inefficiently after a maintenance stop.
- −4Future segment and moatShale oil from retort is a high-cost, CO2-heavy niche that depends on oil price and biomass energy. The largest resource, the Utica gas in Quebec, is blocked by the province's ban on hydrocarbon extraction. No clear moat beyond the recently tested HCCO concept.
- −4Capital allocationThe PX acquisition was paid with 65m shares (of which 50m contingent on milestones), Nimofast management received warrants on 40m shares, and PX is owned only 50% even though it carries 80m US$ in bonds. Market cap is largely unchanged since 2021 (99 → 134m C$) despite large investments.
Price
Today's multiples against the company's own history and its peers. · 2 findings−8 of −35
- −5Multiples vs own history and peersEV/EBITDA 5.1 TTM vs 2.6-6.9 in 2021-24 (17.6 in 2025). P/B 1.47 and P/TBV 3.85 vs 0.5-0.7 in 2021-24. Small oil and gas companies typically trade at 2-4x EBITDA, so the stock is not cheap, even though the price has fallen.
- −3FCF pricingP/FCF 27.9 and EV/FCF 39.2, because only a little of EBITDA turns into free cash flow after capex, working capital and interest accrual. The FCF yield is only 3.6%.
Cracks
Cash flow, customers, debt, insiders, guidance and what sits behind the headline numbers. · 5 findings−21 of −35
- −7Debt and liquiditySecured bonds of USD 80m (carried at CAD 116.7m) maturing in April 2028 are ring-fenced in Brazil, but interest for all of 2026 is paid as PIK and added to principal. The working capital deficit was CAD 19.1m at 30/6-2026 and CAD 51.5m in Brazil, and the current ratio is 0.82.
- −4Customers and operations in BrazilCustomers lifted below the contract minimum, so an inventory of 40,000 barrels built up, and the retort's efficiency and higher feed costs pressure the margin. Sales depend on a few buyers in one country.
- −4Regulation in QuebecQuebec revoked the licences; the constitutional case is slow, with a reply from the attorney general in September 2026 and a hearing on objections in January 2027. The CEO does not expect an actual hearing date until late 2027 or 2028.
- −4Potential dilution50m contingent consideration shares to the PX sellers (milestone: FCF of US$30m by 30/9-2027), warrants on 40m shares to Nimofast and shares worth C$5.8m to PX sellers and Red Leaf together equal about 20% of the 452.8m shares.
- −2Partner and jurisdiction riskPX Energy is run 50/50 with Nimofast (equal number of board seats), and the bonds sit in Forbes Resources Brazil without a parent guarantee, so Questerre does not control its largest activity alone.
Plus
Only documented strengths. · 2 findings+2 of +15
- +1Asset sales and cash flowKakwa Central was sold for C$23.5m in cash (gain C$17.5m), and the working capital deficit fell from C$49.6m to 19.1m. Adjusted funds flow was C$39.1m in H1 2026.
- +1Technology testAn HCCO test at commercial scale succeeded for under C$100,000, and it can reduce internal fuel consumption (about 15% of production). The installation is planned within 12 months.
Caveats
What the score does not capture, or where the data is weak.
Also in Oil & gas
The highest scores in the same industry.

